Saturday, 19 November 2011

Cameron obviously wants to promote growth and enterprise (not)

To begin with I would direct readers to this post from September last year. Whilst the practice of 'gold-plating' may, possibly, be on the decrease, it would appear that the practice of 'copy-over' is in full swing - even if a tad late.

From Christopher Booker's regular column in tomorrow's Sunday Telegraph:
"When David Cameron, implausibly describing himself as a Euro “sceptic”, made reference in his Guildhall speech on Monday to “pointless interference, rules and regulations” from Brussels, he might have been thinking of Kevin Doherty of Yeovil, whose story seems perfectly to exemplify what the Prime Minister was talking about.

When Mr Doherty was made redundant in the 2008 recession, he started his own business, Auto-Movements, taking cars all over the country on a trailer for dealers and leasing companies. All went well – he turns over more than £100,000 a year – until he recently met a friend’s son working for the Vehicle Operator Services Agency (VOSA). He told Mr Doherty that new EU rules coming into force on December 4 might apply to him because the combined weight of his van and trailer exceeds 3.5 tons.

When Mr Doherty discovered what this was about, he was shocked. Under EU Council Regulation 1071/2009, thousands of small businesses like his are being put on the same regulatory footing as large transport firms operating trucks all over Europe. He will have to pay £1,000 and take two weeks off work to obtain an International Certificate of Professional Competence (even though he never works outside the UK), or hire a fully qualified transport manager. He will have to keep £8,000 permanently in the bank as security, and acquire “premises” to store his vehicles when not in use. (Link mine - Ed.)

As shocking as anything was that – although Mr Doherty learned about it only by chance – the new law comes into force in just two weeks’ time. Yet VOSA tells him it will take 12 weeks to process his paperwork. So for more than two months it will be illegal for him to work.

On looking into it, I was astonished to find that the statutory instrument putting the EU regulation into UK law was only laid before Parliament on November 7, less than a month before coming into force. When I discussed this with the Department for Transport, they were clearly sensitive to the difficulties it was creating. They admitted that they had no way of notifying all the businesses that will be affected, but said that VOSA will take no enforcement action for six months, until businesses have had time to comply.

Oddest and most shocking of all, however, is to read in the EU regulation that it is “unnecessary” for it to be applied to firms “which only perform transport operations with a very small impact on the transport market”. If Mr Cameron’s Government had wished it, thousands of tiny operations such as Mr Doherty’s could quite legally have been exempted altogether. Instead, it has imposed on them a wholly unnecessary burden which is likely to force many out of business."
Bearing in mind this directive was issued in October 2009, taking effect from 4th December 2011, just what the hell was happening between October 2009 and November 7th this year?

Just how the hell are SME's in the transport business supposed to flourish when our masters in Brussels seem determined that they won't?

Can we just please leave? Now?

5 comments:

john in cheshire said...

WfW, this again seems to be a case of our servants imposing more severe rules than necessary; regardless of the fact that the rules are not needed in the first place.
There are a lot of civil servants who need to be punished for what they are doing to us.

microdave said...

"There are a lot of civil servants who need to be punished for what they are doing to us."

And the ones who aren't also need to be punished for not stopping those who are.

In fact just shoot the whole damn lot of them...

IanPJ said...

"There are a lot of civil servants who need to be punished for what they are doing to us."

If anyone can clearly identify them, and which legislation/rules/diktats they have worked on, the Albion Alliance Judas Class database would like to hear from you.
The special online data entry and evidence forms will be ready soon, our developers are hard at work as we speak.

Ian said...

Directive

A piece of legislation "sponsored" by big EU businesses from the corruption-riddled European Commission, with the intention of driving their smaller EU-wide competitors out of business.

(Directives are often dressed up as socialistic or greenish measures, to fool the zombie masses.)

Goldplating

The worsening of a directive by UK mandarins, in pursuit of money from large British firms seeking to destroy their smaller UK competitors. The classical example of goldplating was the unnecessary destruction of the British small slaughterhouse sector.

(Goldplating is often mistaken for overzealousness, or stupidity.)

WitteringsfromWitney said...

jic: Agreed.

md: Ditto, especially your last suggestion....!

IPJ: Seconded

Ian: Don't forget the UNECE factor!