Hardly rocket science.......

New research from Labour claims English primary schools will be short of approximately 500,000 places by 2015 unless at least 2,000 new schools are built in the next three years. Shadow Education Secretary Stephen Twigg called on the Government to act in Wednesday's Budget to deal with the "urgent crisis". This is picked up by the Guardian, with the Mail also having an article informing us how some local authorities are intending to cope in the next few years.


Twigg is being true to political form in that having been a member of the preceding government that exacerbated the problem with unlimited immigration, he conveniently fails to remember this and promptly blames the present government. As that Mail article shows, the NAO were reporting that in 1981 just 6% of the population, 3.4 million were foreign born; 2001: 4.9 million and 8%; and by 2009: 6.8 million - 11%. Those foreign born immigrants also produced children; with this report, also in the Mail reporting that 24.6% of births were to foreign born mothers, reaching 174,174 births in 2009 compared to 86,456 in 1998.


This story has now resulted in what usually happens, namely a war of words between a member of the last government and a member of this government with both of them wringing their hands and in effect saying not my fault, Guv. How long have we been suffering politicians, through ideological policies, creating problems which then, later, require solving, those solutions requiring yet more money being taken from taxpayers. And still it continues with Cameron only yesterday informing us of his 'vision' for our country - albeit one mainly dictated by our Masters in Brussels. What struck me with his speech yesterday is he proposes pressing ahead without doing the one thing he says he should. Witness:

"........we should ask instead: what is it that people want for the future?"

Instead of informing us of his next five year plan as part of our democratised/elective dictatorship, perhaps Dav il Cam should do just what he suggests - bloody ask us what we want for the future? 


Just saying.................

Multiculturalism, Racism, Genocide

Up Pompeii picks up on an article in the Mail which states that a surge in babies born to immigrant parents has moved Britain from having one of Europe's most rapidly ageing populations to one of the youngest, according to official figures. It is perhaps worth reproducing UP Pompeii's post in full:

"The population replacement of the UK is almost complete, the demographics are now becoming a reality, by the year 2035 the elderly population of the UK will be the lowest in Europe, the host population being replaced by young children of migrant origin, the English race is doomed, inside two generations from now it will probably not exist.

This damage has been brought about over the past ten years, yes the Nu Labour years, the Blair years, needless to say the article concentrates on the Eastern European influx into the UK and completely ignores the 5-6 million from Pakistan, Bangladesh, North Africa and sub Saharan Africa, this is another example of information manipulation by the media.

The Government must have known about this prior to it publication and I would argue that they must have known for some time. this sheds light on why so little is done about the concerns of the indigenous populations concerns regarding immigration.

Our views, the indigenous populations views do not matter, we are destined to be a small minority in this land and eventually extinct.

The social engineers have won, they have created a population that will destroy the English, this was and still is their intent.

What right have they, the politicians to do this to my country and the people of England, they are truly traitors of immense proportions, they are more dangerous than any other traitor past and present and completely evil.

If you are white, English and educated your days are numbered in the UK, your gene pool has been consigned to the rubbish bin.

Of course all of this is presented as a positive for this country - it is not, the politicians have succeeded in doing what no other has done they have destroyed England, the Romans did not do it neither did William the conqueror.

The next time you are ignored by a shop assistant or petty official or your MP you now know why, we are in the process of being discarded and thus not worthy of any attention - have you ever wondered why our elderly are treated so badly, they are the remnants of a murdered race of an ongoing genocide orchestrated by our own governments"

Readers will no doubt recall the explosive accusation made by Andrew Neather in 2009 when he alleged that the increase in immigration during the Blair years was a deliberate policy to make this country more multicultural.


From Wikipedia we learn that genocide is defined as "the deliberate and systematic destruction, in whole or in part, of an ethnic, racial, religious or national group"  While a precise definition varies amongs genocide scholars, a legal definition is found in the 1948 United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (CPPCG). Article 2 of this convention defines genocide as "any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such: killing members of the group; causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life, calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group children of the group to another group.". It can simply also be known as the intent to destroy a group, in part or in whole.


Some may say that the post by Up Pompeii is over the top, historically incorrect, even racist; however what cannot be denied is that our country is being changed through immigration. It is also true that the birth rates among immigrants are far higher than that experienced among, dare one say, white British is illustrated by this article in the Mail, one which states that at Ealing Hospital, in 2010, of the 3,289 children delivered, an extraordinary 2,655 babies were born to non-British mothers; that statistics also showed the maternity unit last year dealt with women from a total of 104 different nationalities; and that as a result, a team of translators, funded by the taxpayer, had to be on hand around the clock.


Whilst, as Wiki says, the crime of genocide has to have intent proven, where the ethnic rape of our country is concerned I'm with Up Pompeii in that I too believe the white British in their own country are the subject of ongoing genocide orchestrated by their own politicians. It doesn't take a degree in maths to realise that with the birth rate among immigrants being greater than the white British, it won't be long before the white British will be a minority in their own land.


It is worth noting that in this social engineering of our country, as with so much else to which we have been subjected, you were not asked if you agreed with it.


And you still wish to live under our system of democratised dictatorship?


Just asking...................

Just why do we elect these idiots?

The latest findings from the Office of National Statistics (ONS) shows, according to the BBC, that where immigration is concerned:

"....an increase from 235,000 in June 2010 but a fall from 255,000 in September 2010."

and that net migration to Britain remained steady at 250,000.


I find it incongruous that Damien Green can herald these figures as a decrease - likewise I find it incongruous for Chris Bryant to criticise the present government for failing to live up to the pledge to cut immigration, especially when one remembers it was Bryant's party that caused the problem in the first place - and for possible electoral gain. I am sure we all recall Andrew Neather


I find it totally unacceptable for politicians to, in effect, lie to the public about immigration, or any other matter. What is under discussion here is the inward immigration from outside the United Kingdom, which the government is trying to control whilst having no control of those immigrants coming from Member States of the EU - yet the impression given by our politicians is they are attempting to control immigration per se - and for the purposes of political point scoring opposition MPs allow that misconception to continue.


That MPs lie to their constituents is well known and is a deficit in our democratic system. Whilst on the subject of deficits in our democratic system, allow me to mention two others in passing. My constituency MP also happens to be our Prime Minister (a fact which may already be known), however my MP cannot rise in Parliament and highlight the plight of one of his constituents - neither can a Secretary of State or Minister. That is equality where parliamentary representation is concerned? (And please don't even mention that 'other routes' may be available to my MP or those of any others that hold ministerial responsibility). How many readers have a district councillor who also happens to be a county councillor? To take Witney as an example, the county council of Oxfordshire are hell bent on the imposition of a 'relief road', roads being their 'competence' (one which began with a costing of £12million but has now escalated to a cost of £20million), yet a growing number of residents in Witney are against this 'relief road'. What is the point in them lobbying their district councillor when that same person is also a member of the county council and has voted for that road to go ahead? Conflict of interest?


Anyway, returning to the original topic of this post, I am drawn to a post from Up Pompeii highlighting the percentage of births in this country where one, or both, parents is foreign born. And society in our country, its traditions and customs, is not being socially engineered? When the events portrayed in two books mentioned in my sidebar, namely "The Horse at the Gates" and "Invasion", come to pass - as they surely will if current policies are continued - it will be too late for our political elite to recall the old adage: as you sow, so shall you reap.


If only I were able to repeat the attempt by Guy Fawkes - but this time with a successful result!

From nation to province

Three videos featuring a speech by Enoch Powell in 1976:

Listen to his words and then tell me the difference between the Conservative Party then - and now.

And another video, this time on immigration: 

"....politicians of all parties will say when Enoch Powell is right - we won't say that in public but we know it in private - Enoch Powell is right and it will no doubt develop as he says, but its better for us to do nothing now and let it happen, perhaps after our time, than to seize the many poisonous nettles which we would have to seize, if we were at this stage to attempt to avert the outcome; so let it go on until a third of central London, a third of Birmingham and Wolverhampton are coloured, until the civil war comes - let it go on, we won't be blamed, we'll either have gone or we'll slip out from under, somehow."

For those too young to have witnessed this man; for those who can't be bothered to learn their history; this man was vilified by the then 'political class' - and still is. When the likes of Blair, Brown, Cameron, MilibandE and Clegg are too but 'figures of history', it is those that follow who will have to deal with the aftermath of their 'beliefs'.

The only disagreement that I have with Powell was with his belief in 'parliamentary democracy' because it amounts to a 'democratised dictatorship' imposed by the leaders of our political parties - if this great man had only believed in direct democracy we would surely not be in the 'state' we are!

Planning & Immigration

From the letters column Daily Telegraph 8th September:

"SIR – A sensible solution would be to encourage more development in Scotland and Wales, where there are vast open spaces but few people. To paraphrase the film Field of Dreams, "If you build it, they will come." 

Mycal Miller
London NW20"

 From the letters column Daily Telegraph 9th September:

"SIR – Mycal Miller’s phrase, “If you build it, they will come”, caught my eye (Letters, September 8).

The problem is that we are not building it, yet they are still coming.


Mike Bridgeman Devizes, Wiltshire"

And the answer is............?

How it should be!

EurActiv reports that the canton of Vaud has rejected an initiative to grant the right to vote to non-Swiss residents, even though they may have been resident for ten years. Raphaël Mahaim, a Green Party politician and co-president of the initiative, told the Swiss press:

"For the majority of Vaud residents there is still an important link between nationality and local political rights."

Now there's the basis for a good immigration policy! Yup, you can come to our country to visit, you can  come to our country to live - just don't expect to have a voice in deciding how we live!

Now, what's not to like about that idea.........?