Showing posts with label Robert Winnett. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Robert Winnett. Show all posts

Wednesday, 18 January 2012

Ripp-Ed Off

Ed Miliband has 'been speaking to the Daily Telegraph', so we are informed by Robert Winnett and Mary Riddell, at least according to the print edition. MilibandE states we have to call time on the surcharge culture; that it is about rules that government set; that car parking charges at railway stations should be capped, along with season tickets and other fares; that on bank charges a new watchdog should have the power to intervene and outlaw excessive fees.


If it is time to take action on the surcharge culture perhaps a start could be made with the public subsidy for food and drink in the Palace of Westminster, perhaps a start could be made with the public subsidy paid to employ what are not even second-rate politicians.


If season ticket and other fares are to be capped, perhaps MilibandE would like to publicly state that, should by some quirk of fate he became Prime Minister, he will not impose the 'user-pays' principle when it is introduced by the European Union?


At a time when it is generally accepted that the public sector is bloated and needs trimming, in true socialist fashion all MilibandE can suggest is yet another watchdog be created, one funded by the public.


Lastly - and most importantly - MilibandE states that ultimately its about the rules government sets - err, what?! So in electing a political party based on a piece of incomplete fiction (they call it a mandate), one that only contains broad outlines of policy, we get dictated to by rules government set? And people say we do not live under a democratised dictatorship?


And this idiot wants to end the rip-off of the public when the greatest rip-off merchants are the section of our society of which he is a member!

Thursday, 15 December 2011

An Englishman's home is not his castle then.....


Today brings news of yet another Cameron 'invasion' into people's lives with the announcement that 'problem families' will be having an 'adviser' visiting them to set them on the straight and narrow in order that they can return to being productive members of our society. According to Robert Winnett, who pens the article in the Telegraph, these advisers, or troubleshooters, will draw up a plan with each of the families to turn around their lives with targets to return parents to work, stop them from drinking or taking drugs, and ensuring children go to school and do not behave anti-socially. This is, indeed, an odd policy coming from a party that used to believe in people managing their own lives and thus looking after themselves; that preaches a loosening of government central control;  - oh wait, we no longer have a Conservative Party..........

Just how will these advisers/troubleshooters change an ingrained life of state dependency on housing, income, food, free health care etc? Still, it creates yet another quango, with the required bureaucrats, the creation of which will no doubt give birth to another 'charity' or two to assist them. And just who will be paying for all this, a policy which logic dictates is doomed to fail? Inspector Gadget makes a good few points in his post when he states, for example, that perhaps problem families should stop randomly having children they cannot afford and then expecting the state to raise them. IG continues:
"30 million other families who never do any of the above seem to manage. Don’t they? Maybe not. No one fits me a new kitchen free of charge when the appliances are out of date. No one fits my home with double glazing and insulation for free. No one pays for my children’s school meals and no one rushes about paying me endless attention, treating me as a ‘service user’ and generally wiping my arse for me at the drop of a hat. If you add to that fact that the government will probably take my house off me to pay for my care when I am elderly while the problem family receives it for free, it makes you wonder who the mugs are after all. And therein lies the reason why so-called problem families will never change. Why should they. It’s a gravy train."
Cameron is quoted as stating that we (presumably the country) cannot afford to keep footing the bill for what he terms is 'this social failure'. Err, who caused this social failure by allowing the education system to be treated like a 'political football' since the days of Anthony Crossland? Just who has overseen the demise in said education system; of standards and the teaching of discipline? Just who has overseen the breakdown of our society whilst simultaneously practising 'social engineering'? What we see here is a situation whereby politicians, having 'controlled' said demise with misguided policies, issue yet more misguided policies - and in so doing, continuing to heap yet more 'control' on that already exercised. A further question arises and that is if a government disapproves, as it does in this particular instance, of a certain type of lifestyle; how long before, at the behest of 'charities' and other 'social-improvement' organisations, those of us who do drink, smoke, watch television, like certain types of food - all in moderation - are 'visited' because our lifestyles are not considered 'correct'?

Inspector Gadget believes these problem families will never voluntarily change their habits as they are on a gravy train - bit like our politicians, really. One could pose the question who is the greater drain on the public purse - but I digress...............

Just saying.........................